Purpose

There is a need for a simple, reliable staging system for multiple myeloma that can be applied internationally for patient classification and stratification.

Patients and Methods

Clinical  and  laboratory  data  were  gathered  on  10,750  previously  untreated  symptomatic myeloma patients from 17 institutions, including sites in North America, Europe, and Asia. Potential prognostic factors were evaluated by univariate and multivariate techniques. Three modeling approaches were then explored to develop a staging system including two nontree and one tree survival assessment methodologies.

Results

Serum beta2-microglobulin (SB2M), serum albumin, platelet count, serum creatinine, and age emerged as powerful predictors of survival and were then used in the tree analysis approach. A combination of SB2M and serum albumin provided the simplest, most powerful and reproducible three-stage classification. This new International Staging System (ISS) was validated in the remaining patients and consists of the following stages: stage I, SB2M less than 3.5 mg/L plus serum albumin > 3.5 g/dL (median survival, 62 months); stage II, neither stage I nor III (median survival, 44 months); and stage III, SB2M > 5.5 mg/L (median survival,29  months).  The  ISS  system  was  further  validated  by  demonstrating  effectiveness  in patients in North America, Europe, and Asia; in patients less than and > 65 years of age; in patients with standard therapy or autotransplantation; and in comparison with the Durie/ Salmon  staging  system.

Conclusion

The new ISS is simple, based on easy to use variables (SB2M and serum albumin), and recommended for early adoption and widespread use.

Authors:

Philip R. Greipp, Jesus San Miguel, Brian G.M. Durie, John J. Crowley, Bart Barlogie, Joan Bladé, Mario Boccadoro, J. Anthony Child, Jean-Luc Harousseau, Robert A. Kyle, Juan J. Lahuerta, Heinz Ludwig, Gareth Morgan, Raymond Powles, Kazuyuki Shimizu, Chaim Shustik, Pieter Sonneveld, Patrizia Tosi, Ingemar Turesson, and Jan Westin

J Clin Oncol 23. © 2005 by American Society of Clinical Oncology

Click here to view Article